世界遺產(chǎn)中心點名批評火車站站改工程

京城長安

問問世界遺產(chǎn)那幫人，西安城住不住現(xiàn)代人？

來自安卓APP客戶端

冰中烈焰

luocheng 發(fā)表于 2021-06-26 23:02
本帖最后由 luocheng 于 2021-6-26 23:17 編輯

大明宮有遺產(chǎn)嗎？充其量就是遺址吧。有時候覺得很搞笑，十年前這地方還是棚戶區(qū)，現(xiàn)在卻要供奉起來。公園就公園唄，誠實一點多好啊，市民能直管感受到它，你說它有歷史就有歷史唄，市民也不反對。但你真把歷史當一回事，扯得太多了，就會沒人愿意聽了。試想，五千年的歷史，哪個城市腳下沒點歷史？如果都要圈起來，豈不是滿城都是遺址？

這可是唐大明宮啊。。。。。。怎么被你說的這么一文不值了。。。。。。旗幟鮮明反對歷史虛無主義�。。。。�！

來自蘋果APP客戶端

litanjun16

說實話世遺還不如復建一個含元殿來的直接，世界遺產(chǎn)有啥用

來自安卓APP客戶端

大唐尚圖寺

現(xiàn)在世界誰怕誰？怕你就輸了

來自安卓APP客戶端

lulu84825

關鍵是火車站又沒蓋到大明宮里面，而且為了不遮擋大明宮遺址的東南角把立交方案都撤了，一點也沒見到世界遺產(chǎn)中心的表揚。

來自安卓APP客戶端

云漢梵拓

shulinbao 發(fā)表于 2021-06-26 23:32
It is also regrettable that the State Party of China did not submit the proposal for re-developing and enlarging the Xi’an Railway Station at an earlier stage, to avert or mitigate adverse impacts on the setting of the Daming Palace component, as detailed in the ICOMOS Technical Review. Had the HIA been prepared earlier and been submitted to the World Heritage Centre with proposed designs, this project might have been amended to avoid its adverse impacts on the setting of the Daming Palace site. However, at this late stage, when construction work is already underway and the project is due for completion in July 2021, it is not feasible to recommend changes that might mitigate the adverse impacts in any meaningful way. It is recommended that the Committee remind the States Parties of the provisions of Paragraphs 118bis and 172 of the Operational Guidelines regarding any major restoration or new construction which may affect the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, and that such plans, including assessment of potential impacts on the property’s OUV, should be submitted as soon as possible and before making any decision that would be difficult to reverse. In the case of this serial transnational property, it is recommended that coordination should also be sought through the ICC.

幸好這次西安這次跟世界遺產(chǎn)中心提交的晚了，不然看世界遺產(chǎn)中心的意思，這個火車站的建筑方案非得修改不成。

這段里面沒說到底咋負面影響了。是外觀風貌嘛還是咋了。

來自蘋果APP客戶端

洋小兔兒

13453968916 發(fā)表于 2021-06-26 23:39
這話說的有意思，不想遵守人家群的規(guī)則，咱可以不進人家的群，也沒人強迫加入吧？總不能既想進群，又不想遵守規(guī)則吧。這話沒錯吧？

為什的不行呢？選擇有利于自己的執(zhí)行，不利于自己的舍棄忽略。西方大國不都是這樣的么？

來自安卓APP客戶端

騷的呢兄弟

和那種國際環(huán)保組織一樣，環(huán)別人的保，牽扯到自己的利益就閉嘴了。

來自安卓APP客戶端